Sunday, August 14, 2016

Franchises: The Fly. Curse of the Fly (1965)

This is a movie that I knew about for years, thanks to that Monster Madness book that really got me interested in The Fly as well as other publications, but I didn't see it until 2007 when I was twenty years old; however, I'm far from the only one who was only recently introduced to it. Up until that year, when it was released on DVD in a box-set with the other two films, you simply couldn't get this film, as it was never even released on VHS or laserdisc. It played on TV here and there, as I can remember seeing a tiny glimpse of it on either CineMax or HBO one morning before school (high school, that is) and, the day I saw Return of the Fly on the Fox Movie Channel, it was listed as being the next movie afterward (I didn't see it because my parents and I went out to eat then), but otherwise, it remained one of those obscure movies that few people knew about and even fewer people had seen. I knew a little bit about the plot from various stuff that I had read and was aware that it was a very unusual sequel in that there was no Vincent Price or a fly-monster, for that matter, dealing more with the Delambre family and a bunch of mutated people, and that it was shot in England without any affiliation with 20th Century Fox, who ultimately only distributed it in America. I saw a lot of it on a documentary by AMC called The Fly Papers: The Buzz on Hollywood's Scariest Insect, which was included as a special feature on the 2006 DVD for the sequel to the Cronenberg film, The Fly II, but because of its obscure status, I wrote off ever actually seeing the movie itself, especially when I learned it was never even released on video. But then, in 2007, I learned of that upcoming box-set and knew that it was something I had to have. Sure enough, I received it as a Christmas present that year and I then spent New Year's Day, 2008 going through it. As far as my thoughts on Curse of the Fly were when I finally saw it, I could definitely say it was an interesting movie, which is how I still feel now. I'm not going to call it an obscure classic that everyone should rediscover or anything of that nature, but it is a unique specimen of a sequel, with a fairly interesting story, a pretty good cast, and some disturbing stuff here and there, making it, if nothing else, a nice answer to the campiness of Return of the Fly.

Patricia Stanley, a troubled young woman who was being treated for a severe mental breakdown, escapes from the Fournier Mental Hospital one night, clad in only her bra and underwear, and is immediately discovered and picked up by Martin Delambre on his way to Montreal. After stealing some clothes for her, he takes her to the hotel in the city he's staying at, putting her up and giving her money until she can get back on her feet. Meanwhile, he prepares to send some new equipment to his house in Quebec, as he and his father, Henri, along with his London-stationed brother, Alan, are close to perfecting the teleportation that generations of the Delambre family have devoted their lives to working on. They've already managed to enable it to teleport subjects across the Atlantic but hasn't come without a heavy cost, as radiation burns on Henri's body can attest to, as well as other, far more horrific mutations. Martin spends a week in Montreal with Pat, whom he falls in love with and proposes marriage to, not revealing the nature of his work to her or the horrible effects it's had. He also keeps secret a disturbing condition of rapid aging, caused by inherited, recessive fly genes, that can only be curtailed by regular injections of a special serum. He and his new wife head home to Quebec, where Martin is forced to install the new lab equipment immediately in order to teleport his father back from London. Once he's arrived, Martin tells Henri about his marriage, a fact that the elder Delambre is not happy about, seeing it as unfair to the girl as well as dangerous to the secrecy of their work. His latter concern soon proves justified when Madame Fournier reports Pat's escape from the mental hospital to Montreal detective Inspector Ronet and in his search for her, he hears of Martin and digs into the family's past. Upon arriving at the Delambre house with Fournier and meeting both Martin and Henri, as well as learning of the marriage, Ronet contacts the now hospitalized Inspector Charas, from who he learns Martin is already married to a woman named Judith who is not known to have divorced him or died. As it turns out, Judith is one of the people horribly mutated by the teleportation device, who are all kept locked in a separate building like animals. She's not too fond of Pat's presence or of her playing the piano in the house she once played, and the same goes for the Chinese housemaid, Wan, who acts hostilely towards Pat and begins attempting to frighten her into madness. With the police now snooping around, learning of the family's "curse," and Pat herself learning more and more about the true nature of her husband's work, Henri decides they must proceed with their work and use the teleporter to escape to London while disposing of all evidence of their experiments. Pat realizes too late that she's married into the wrong family and, as her fragile mindset is pushed to the breaking point by what's going on, she must try to escape the horrific madhouse while she can.

The director here is Don Sharp, a former Australian actor who began to gravitate behind the camera in the late 50's, as a writer and a director. Before directing Curse of the Fly, he'd notably done England's first rock 'n' roll movie, The Golden Disc, in 1958, The Kiss of the Vampire, a pretty good Hammer horror flick in 1963, and Witchcraft, a 1964 flick that starred Lon Chaney Jr. in one of his last leading roles. Sharp was no stranger to working with low-budgets but regardless, the meager budget he had to work with here, as well as the very short shooting schedule of 28 days, really tested him, although I think the film, despite some problems here and there, came out pretty well, all things considered. Afterward, he directed Christopher Lee in several films, such as The Face of Fu Manchu (his immediate follow-up to Curse of the Fly) and its 1966 sequel, The Brides of Fu Manchu, as well as Rasputin, the Mad Monk, and went on to do Jules Verne's Rocket to the Moon, several episodes of The Avengers and The Champions, a James Bond cash-in called Our Man in Marrakesh, an adaptation of The Four Feathers, and a remake of Alfred Hitchcock's The 39 Steps, among many other films. He spent the last decade of his career working mainly in television before retiring after directing the TV mini-series, Act of Will. He died in 2011 at the age of 90.

Despite being third-billed, Carole Gray is the real star of the film in her role as Patricia Stanley, a woman whose rough life only gets worse after she escapes from Fournier Mental Hospital. Following the opening, you learn from Madame Fournier that, despite her having been in an institution, Pat is not insane but rather suffered from a severe mental breakdown. She was pushed by her mother to become a great concert pianist, an attempt by the woman to live out her own dreams through her daughter, but when the mother died not too long before what would have been her debut, Pat's psyche couldn't take it and she basically became a child again. It's never made clear exactly why she broke out, as she seems to have been receiving good treatment and you get no hint that they were abusive towards her, but, given how Fournier says that they all felt she was responding well to the treatments, the best guess is that her unstable mind made her paranoid and fearful towards them all for no reason. Indeed, when Fournier visits the Delambre house with Inspector Ronet, Pat runs and hides like a frightened, confused child. However, after she escapes from the institution, she seems and acts perfectly normal, never coming across as dangerously out of touch or emotionally unstable, with the only questionable thing she does is lying to Martin about where she came from and agreeing to marry him without telling him the truth, something she later comes to regret in more ways than one. Henri even mentions to Fournier that Pat seems to have recovered quite well since her escape, although the horrific things she sees and experiences at the house begin to damage her fragile psyche. Seeing the hideous "animals" that are being used in her husband's experiments and feeling some unmistakable hostility from Wan, the Chinese housemaid, is bad enough, but it gets all the worse when Wan, who has a connection to Martin's mutated first wife, Judith, begins trying to frighten her to death. She arranges it so Pat sees Judith and does other things like putting a picture of her when she was normal within Pat's sight while she's sleeping, and then removing all evidence and denying that it ever happened. Combined with Martin and Henri's going along with Wan's lies to keep their tragic family history a secret, Pat begins to question her sanity and also becomes paranoid of everyone, thinking they might be all against her. She eventually discovers that everything she's seen is real and is horrified to learn from Martin that the "animals" she saw are actually mutated humans and that Judith is one of them. After that, Pat is put through one horrific situation after another: chased throughout the house and into the laboratory by Judith, attempts to escape but is brought back into the house by Henri and Martin, is almost teleported across the ocean (which would have been disastrous since, over in London, Albert had destroyed the integrator), and is dragged outside by a rapidly-aging Martin, who ultimately dies from his condition. By then, she's a frightened, crying mess who's being comforted by Inspector Ronet. And that's why it's important to know what family you're marrying into. Joking aside, the character goes through quite a lot in the story but I'm afraid that Gray's acting is kind of hit and miss. She's already at coming across as scared and hysterical but, otherwise, she's mostly kind of flat and not that compelling.

George Baker portrays Martin Delambre as someone who isn't a bad person overall but, in the end, makes a lot of ill-advised and questionable decisions, the biggest one being his hasty decision to marry this young woman he met under mysterious circumstances, whom he's only known for a little over a week, and who he knows next to nothing about. That would be a dumb decision in any case but when you add in the nature of his work, the horrible blunders he and his father have had in the past, and the condition of rapid aging that he has to keep under control with a special serum, it gets compounded all the more. You find out that, while he does believe in the perfection of the teleportation machine and is willing to help his father in completing it, he also, like his brother, Alan, wants a life of his own, which is why he married Pat, although he's willing to lie to his new wife about everything, including Judith, whom he insists doesn't exist and which makes Pat begin to question her sanity, in order to have it. Speaking of Judith, the way he treats her like an animal, keeping her locked in a stable-like building separate from the main house, and doesn't seem to have much emotion towards her or what happened to her, makes him look quite sketchy, especially when he tries to act like his father and say that the ends justify the means with this machine. That said, though, he's not completely without conscience, at one point wondering if his brother is actually wrong when he refers to him and Henri as monsters (suggesting that what he said to Pat was an attempt to justify what he'd done to Judith and the others to himself when, in actuality, it does weigh on his mind) and being quite shaken at times by his father's lack of empathy and unwavering justifications about the questionable things they do, including what they do the two other mutant humans they have outside. There's even a point where Martin comes to realize that marrying her was a selfish mistake on his part and contemplates letting her go but when Henri insists that they must transport her to London as well since she now knows everything thanks to Martin, he goes along with it. Unfortunately for him, his revelation has turned Pat against him, which is made even worse when she awakens inside the disintegrator pod and escapes, and his rapid aging comes on again and this time, without the serum to help him, he's eventually reduced to a skeleton inside his car, his last lines being pleas with Pat to help him.

One guy who's truly unscrupulous in his devotion to completing the teleportation machine is Brian Donlevy as Henri Delambre. He feels that the advancement in science and the incredible change the device will have on the world is totally worth whatever they have to do in order to perfect it, including using humans as guinea pigs that ultimately wind up as mutated freaks or, more horrifically, disposing of them by teleporting them to London at the same time, where they're reintegrated as a disgusting mass of flesh that his second son, Albert, is forced to destroy. Moreover, he even puts the machine above his own health, refusing to tell Martin that he suffered radiation burns when he was teleported before as a result of the proper equipment not being installed. Whenever one of his sons calls him out on his actions, he often makes the excuse that, as scientists, they must do anything they can to further their research, even if it's something they hate, and he also points to the history the Delambre family has had with the machine, a mindset that makes him unable to understand why both of his sons want a life of their own outside of the family tradition, particularly Albert, whom he views as misguided and confused by the relationship he's struck up with a woman in London. Henri is said to also be affected by the cold and by instances of rapid aging like Martin but we never see him go through any attacks like his son. For all his faults, Henri proves to not be completely heartless, as when he learns of Martin's marriage to Pat, he tells him, "Send her back. You mustn't do this to her." He also acts very kindly towards her when he meets her and, actually, comes across as a rather pleasant guy throughout the entire film, never raising his voice in an angry way or acting malicious in any way, although, again, his lack of empathy and morals clash heavily with how he comes across. Despite how pleasantly he acts towards Pat, he does sees her as a problem, especially when the police begin snooping around the property and delving into the family's history as a result. He feels that they have no choice but to proceed quickly with their final experiments and, eventually, relocate to London while destroying any trace of their life in Quebec. And once Pat is told the whole truth by Martin, Henri now insists that they teleport her with them, feeling that they can't risk her going to the police. He is good enough to allow himself to be teleported first to make sure there are no ill-effects but, like other members of his family, the machine he's been so devoted to ultimately proves to be his downfall, as Albert's smashing of the integrator in London ensures that he's lost forever.

Although he doesn't have much screentime, Albert Delambre (Michael Graham) is significant in that he's one member of the family's who's not only lucky enough not to have inherited the afflictions of his father and brother (something that you can feel Martin is a bit jealous of) but he also vehemently wants a life away from the teleporter, something that he can't make Henri understand. He's become involved with a woman in London and is now very unreliable towards his father, which he sees as misplaced priorities on Albert's part. Henri also feels that Albert is the one who told the authorities in London that he didn't have a visa, forcing him retreat back to Quebec via the teleporter, although it's never proven whether or not that was the case. The final straw for Albert is when Henri and Martin transport two of the mutated humans, Samuels and Dill, together, causing them to reintegrate as an ugly mass of cells that he's forced to destroy. Enraged at his father for turning him into a murderer, Albert refuses to help him and Martin when they attempt to teleport to London, telling Martin that Henri is a madman. However, when Martin insists upon teleporting Henri, Albert is unable to warn him in time that, in killing Samuels and Dill, he destroyed the integrator and the rest of the equipment with an axe in a rage, making them unable to bring Henri back. Upon realizing that he's killed his father through his actions, Albert breaks down crying, unable to answer his brother when he tells him over the radio to start the reintegration process, and walks out of the lab, never to be seen again.

Of the Delambres' two Asian house servants, Tai and Wan (sadly, it was only until I began writing this review that I realized the significance of those two names), Tai (Burt Kwouk) is the more pleasant of the two, coming across as friendly and devoted to the family. He not only goes along with whatever they tell him to do, including helping Martin install the new equipment, without any struggle or argument but always with a smile, he also, in stark contrast to Wan, happily welcomes Pat into the family and makes no move against her. In fact, the only significant he does is near the end of the movie when he tries to stop Judith from killing Pat and he ends up killing her in the struggle. Wan (Yvette Rees, a Welsh woman who's wearing a pretty obvious makeup appliance to make her look Asian), on the other hand, is far less reliable, especially when it comes to Pat. She takes an immediate disliking to her when she shows up to the house, acting cold and hostile towards her, and the reason for it is because of an unexplained closeness she has to the mutated Judith. She goes out to the building where the mutants are kept to calm Judith down when she becomes upset upon hearing Pat playing the piano she used to play and afterward, glares at Pat when she stumbles into that section of the property while trying to hide herself from Madame Fournier and Inspector Ronet. After that, she lets Judith out and allows her to play the piano herself, only for Pat to stumble across her, prompting Wan to come up behind her and choke her out before taking Judith back to her cell. Wan later denies that anything happened, both to cover up the Delambres' secrets but also in a plan that she's come up with to drive Pat crazy by making her think she's seeing things and losing her mind (it's not clear whether bringing Judith to the piano was part of that plan or not). She amps up this plan during the third act by placing a picture of Judith before she was mutated on the nightstand by Pat's bed, removing it while she's unconscious after she knocks it to the floor, and then releases Judith to send her after Pat, provoking her rage by telling her, "She's in the bedroom... She's in your bedroom." This plan kind of backfires on her, though, as Judith attacks Wan and throws her into the cell before heading to the house to take care of Pat. She's only released by Tai afterward and the two of them, realizing it's all falling apart, flee the house after disposing of Judith's body with the disintegrator (Tai's only moment of disloyalty, as Henri told him to remain behind to teleport Martin). While they're never seen again, Ronet puts an APB out on them right before the movie ends.

According to Inspector Charas, Martin met Judith (Mary Manson) at his university and that, before her horrible mutation, not only was she quite good-looking, as you can tell from her picture, but that she was very bright and a talented pianist. Whether she was forced to be teleported or volunteered is never made clear but, regardless, she's now completely mute, the left side of her body is hideously deformed, and the family, except for Wan and, at some points, Martin, no longer consider her to be human, locking her outside with their other human guinea pigs. Pat's appearance as Martin's new wife and the woman of the house absolutely drives Judith crazy, especially when she hears her playing the piano that she no longer can. The scene where she does try to play the piano again but can't do it well due to her deformed left hand makes her quite pitiable, especially when Pat sees her and she quickly covers the mutated side of her face in both fear and shame. However, it's apparent that Judith's mind is quite unstable now, as you can tell when she suddenly grabs and squeezes Wan's hand when she's trying to comfort her over Pat's playing, so much so that she scratches into her skin, causing her to bleed. And like I said up above, when Wan lets her out and tells her that Pat's in her bedroom, Judith's rage erupts and she attacks Wan before heading towards the house to deal with Pat. Unfortunately, the bit where she chases Pat through the house and into the laboratory is one of the film's weaker moments, as Judith is so slow thanks to her deformed left foot that it comes across like one of those old mummy movies where the victim should be able to easily evade it. They get around that by having Judith corner Pat in a hallway where both doors are locked but still, it's so clichéd to see Pat stand there, waiting for Judith to kill her, when she could easily get around her. Fortunately for her, Tai opens the door to the lab behind her, allowing her to escape, while he tries to stop Judith but when she attacks him, he's forced to kill her with a wrench.

Inspector Charas (Charles Carson) returns after having been absent from Return of the Fly, now old, hospitalized, and apparently very sensitive to bright light as he now always wears very dark glasses. His role in the film is to do little more than to get Inspector Ronet (Jeremy Wilkins) up to speed about the Delambres and also to inform the audience about the ailments that Martin and Henri suffer from due to their grandfather's past blunders. Ronet has even less of a role than simply being a detective who gets involved with Delambres and their past due to his investigation into Pat's escape from the mental hospital. All he does is snoop around, digging up what he can on them in order to get a search warrant, and when he finally does, he shows up at the mansion at the end just in time to comfort Pat after everything that she's been through. Finally, there's Madame Fournier (Rachel Kempson), who's a little interesting in that she talks about she and everyone at the institution had been giving Pat the best treatment they could and also speaks like she is concerned for her well-being, but her monotone voice and way of reiterating the seriousness of Pat's condition in an attempt to convince the Delambres to send her back, as well as Pat's fear of her, suggest that there might be something more sinister going on that's never explained. And I apologize for the lack of images in this section but I could not, for the life of me, find any of these characters. In fact, it took me an ungodly amount of time to find that image of Tai and Wan and even it isn't ideal.

In case you haven't figured it out by now, Curse of the Fly is definitely a contender for one of the most unusual sequels ever made, mainly because there's no fly-monster to be found here. As a result, it's inevitable for it to be compared with films like Halloween III: Season of the Witch and Friday the 13th Part V: A New Beginning but, in my opinion, the best comparison is with The Curse of the Cat People, the 1944 sequel to the well-known Val Lewton film. While that film is a continuation of the story and characters of Cat People, it goes in a completely different direction and is much more of a ghost story, rather than being another film about a person who fears they may be turning into a panther. That was done because Lewton didn't want to simply do a repeat of his earlier film and that's possibly how Robert Lippert, the uncredited producer on all three of these films, and writer Harry Spaulding felt. When you get right down to it, that kind of mix-up with a fly can only happen so many times, accidental or not, so the filmmakers probably decided that it would be best to go in a different direction, with the curse in question alluding to the horrors that have befallen the Delambre family ever since Andre's first doomed experiment. But, even as sequel, the film takes a number of liberties with its connections to its predecessors; moreover, it seems to follow the events of The Fly, to a point, and completely ignores Return of the Fly. In the scene where Inspector Charas tells Ronet the story of what happened to Andre, it matches up for the most part: he mentions Andre's experiments with teleportation, the disastrous experiment that the fly got caught up in (he shows Ronet a picture of a fly-man, which is actually taken from Return of the Fly; let's not even try to get into how in the hell he got such a photo), how he thought Helene was insane when she told him the story, and how he realized the truth. However, then Charas says, "Later his son reversed the experiment and put the fly and the monster in the glass case and restored them to their original conditions." At first, I thought that maybe that was an oddly-worded reference to what happened to Philippe in the second film and how he was restored to normalcy but, when you think about it, it doesn't add up. If Andre was Martin's grandfather, then, logically, it follows that he was Henri's father, meaning that we're now in a continuity where Andre had a different son from Philippe, who was his and Helene's only child in the original, and that he apparently managed to reverse Andre's mutation. Maybe since they were unable to get Vincent Price, who was under contract to American-International Pictures and doing the Edgar Allan Poe movies with Roger Corman around this time and who acted as the one link between the two previous films, they felt they needed to rewrite the history of the series, even though I don't think it was necessary.

Plus, they still create plotholes for themselves in their revisions. They say that both Henri and Martin suffered from the cold and from bouts of rapid aging, meant to have been passed down to them from Andre due to the mixing with the fly... but, that would have to mean that Henri wasn't born until after the mutation and, what's more, if he was the one who eventually reversed it, that would have to mean he was conceived while his father was mutated. God, can you imagine Helene doing it with that fly-headed man? Even that scenario, as unsettling as it is, doesn't work because of the very short life-spans of flies and the amount of time that would have to pass for Henri to grow up and become knowledgeable enough to figure out how to make things right. Maybe that could mean that Philippe really was Henri's father and the recessive fly-genes came from him as a result of the mutation he went through but, again, that doesn't seem to be the case given what Charas says, how Philippe is never mentioned, and how Andre is referred to as Martin's "grandfather" rather than his "great-grandfather." And Albert's not having these problems is not explained at all. We're just told that he's completely normal. People complain about the science of the original film but for me, the convolutions in this story are much more maddening when you try to piece everything together.

While it's still a pretty low budget movie, I think Curse of the Fly handles itself better than Return of the Fly in terms of its production values. I think the laboratories look pretty good, a little more advanced and sinister-looking than the reuse of the set of Andre's lab in the previous film, and the interiors of the Delambre house, which we see a lot more of than we did Philippe's house before, and the hotel Martin and Pat stay at in Montreal look quite elegant. Normally, whenever movies back then shot outside, it ended up giving off a feeling of cheapness but the exterior shots here are actually pretty well-done. Okay, the scene where Martin and Pat have a picnic of sorts in this barren spot in the middle of a Montreal forest looks pretty cheap but, other than that, I thought the exteriors are lit very well, particularly the scenes outside the building where the mutant humans are kept, and the film looks absolutely gorgeous and atmospheric at night, with the deep blacks and the bright whites. That's another thing about the movie: its look. I think it handles the black-and-white photography a little better than Return of the Fly did, coming across as very film noir-like at one points and creating a feel of dread and unease in sequences like when Pat hears someone playing the piano in the middle of the night and gets up to investigate. Don Sharp also manages to do some interesting things with the camerawork and editing to make the film stand out, particularly during the opening, which is shot in slow-motion, giving it a dream-like quality as you watch Pat break out of the institution and run for the gate, not to mention the shot of glass shattering and heading for the camera when she first breaks out. Other notable shots that he creates include the interior shot of Martin's car as he comes across Pat running down the road ahead, a really creepy look at one of the mutated people in his completely black cell that I'll expound upon presently, and a slowly-tilting shot from Martin's POV as he's strangled by the other mutant during their struggle.

Another thing the film has over Return of the Fly is its tone and feel, which is nowhere near as campy. In fact, mood-wise this movie is much more along the lines of the original given how disturbing it often is, both as a result of the mutants you see and the very idea of the ongoing curse of the Delambre family, with members being affected in different ways, be it by the mutations that have been passed down to them, the horrible end results of the use of human guinea pigs, or how they simply can't rid themselves of the family's horrific legacy no matter how hard they try. What's more, the black-and-white photography not only gives it a dark, film noir look and helps create a feeling of unease and dread throughout but, when combined with the creepy science going on in the story, the fact that it was shot over in England, and the presence of Brian Donlevy, it feels a lot like those early Quatermass movies, particularly the first one (which is a disturbing story about the loss of humanity in its own right). And finally, it doesn't have any of the previous film's more pulpy elements, like the  crime thriller angles and the industrial espionage, and the effects work, as we'll get into, is pulled off much more successfully. However, while the film isn't as silly as Return of the Fly, it's not quite as entertaining, either. While it's still only 86 minutes long, it's pretty slow at times, doesn't have as quick of a pace, and the serious treatment of the subject matter makes those slower portions a little hard to sit through sometimes. Plus, the story has so many different elements to it, with Pat's story, the dilemma of the Delambres, Martin's ill-advised decision to marry Pat, the subplot involving Judith and Wan's unexplained attachment to her, Albert trying to break away from the family tradition, and Inspector Ronet's learning of the Delambres' past and attempting to get a search warrant for the property, that it sometimes buckles underneath its own weight. In short, you have to take the good with the bad when it comes to each of these two films.

The special effects makeup for the mutants was created by Harold Fletcher and he did a pretty good job in making them look hideous and disturbing, especially when given the limitations of makeup at that point in time. They're a major part of the film that make it feel much more like a Quatermass movie than anything having to do with The Fly. The first mutation that we see is Martin's sudden bout of rapid aging in Montreal, where his skin is wrinkled and puffy, with a blotched texture to it. We see it again at the end of the movie when Martin has another attack and, without his serum, is eventually reduced to a skeleton after he collapses in his car. Judith's condition is gradually revealed, as we see her deformed left hand when it reaches out from within her cell and grabs ahold of Wan's wrist, twisting it painfully. The full extent of her condition is revealed later on when Pat comes across her as she's playing the piano and we see that the left side of her face is a disgusting mass of tissue, which she covers with her hand. And when Wan escorts her out of the room after she chokes Pat out, we see that her left is elongated and looks almost flipper-like, which is why she's unable to move very fast when she chases Pat later on. We first get a look at the other two mutated people, Samuels and Dill, when Pat ventures out to the cells and one of them looks at her through the window. That one, which is the big, burly man that later attacks Martin in the lab when he tries to teleport him, is pretty average-looking as far as the creatures in this film go. He just looks like a guy with a lot of clay slapped on his face, to me. The one that really freaks me out, though, is the thinner guy who you only get a look at inside his cell. His emaciated body, which you can see full-on as he's not wearing a shirt, combined with the paleness of his skin, bulbous head, and the complete darkness within his cell that he stands out from makes for quite a nightmarish image. As if that wasn't bad enough, when Samuels and Dill are teleported together, they're reintegrated as a disgusting, writhing mass of tissue that's vaguely humanoid in shape. That's what really makes me think of The Quatermass Xperiment, as it reminds me of the monster the poor guy in that film eventually mutated into. And while we're on the subject of makeup in this film, we'd be remissed not to mention the makeup that they had to put on Yvette Rees in order to make her look Asian. While it is well-designed, when you look at it in close-up, it's very obvious that it is indeed an appliance (as if Rees' very put-on accent wasn't enough of a clue that she wasn't actually Asian).

In an interesting tradeoff, Bert Shefter, the friend of original Fly composer Paul Sawtell who assisted him on the score for Return of the Fly, became the sole composer for Curse of the Fly. That said, though, he mainly reuses his friend's score for the original and only comes up with a few original pieces of music. And I'm not exaggerating when I say he reuses the entirety of Sawtell's score: you hear everything, from the main theme when the title comes up, to Andre and Helene's love theme, which is here used for the intimate scenes between Martin and Pat, and even the nightmarish piece for the fly-man's destruction of the lab when Martin begins suffering from another attack of rapid aging at the end and really starts to lose it. Shefter makes them sound a tad bit different by either slowing them down or speeding them up, depending on the piece, and he also reuses one small part of the Return of the Fly score, but still, there's not much music here that you haven't heard before. While it is nice to hear the themes from the original score again, something I missed in the sequel, and their presence, like the tone, is something that, surprisingly, makes the film fall more in line with the first one, it still makes you wonder why Shefter didn't just come up with something completely original. I don't want to call him lazy since, more than likely, the low budget didn't leave him much choice, but it would have been nice to hear more new stuff along with the old music. What few new themes that are here are mostly forgettable horror music and a less memorable love theme for Martin and Pat that isn't used much but he does manage to come up with a nice, poignant piano piece that's first heard during the opening credits and is reiterated a few times throughout the film. It's obviously meant to be a theme for Pat, one that harkens back to her ill-fated attempts in the past to become a great concert pianist. Pat herself plays a nice little tune on the piano in the Delambre house, albeit one that greatly upsets Judith; I don't know if it's a piece that existed before or was made specifically for the movie but it sounds nice and relaxing.

What more can you say about Curse of the Fly? It's definitely a contender for the most unusual sequel ever and, like any movie, it has its good and bad points. On the plus side, it has a new, interesting take on the story of The Fly, some good performances for the most part, some very well-done and unsettling mutant makeup effects, but, in contrast, the story is a tad slow and more complicated than it needs to be, it's connection with the previous films is very muddled, the music score, despite having a couple of nice, original themes, is mainly a rehash of the original's, and the different concepts and lack of a fly-monster might turn off certain viewers. Whether or not it's an improvement on Return of the Fly depends on your tastes: if you didn't care for the second film's campiness and want more of the original's skin-crawling eeriness, you may go for this, but if you enjoyed Return's more shlocky, B-movie feel, you'd probably find this to be plodding and boring. I myself find it to be a flawed but unique film that is a little bit underrated and should be viewed more for what it has rather than what it doesn't. But, as with everything, judge for yourself.

Monday, August 8, 2016

Franchises: The Fly. Return of the Fly (1959)

I knew from the outset that there were a couple of sequels to The Fly thanks to that Monster Madness book that first really piqued my interest in the original but, while I first saw that movie when I was relatively young at the age of 13, I wouldn't see Return of the Fly in full until many years later. I saw it available on both VHS and DVD here and there (in a double-feature DVD with the original, much like the David Cronenberg film and its sequel) and I caught bits of it on TV, specifically on AMC and the Fox Movie Channel, the latter of which is where I saw its second half, but I didn't see the entire film until the beginning of 2008 when I went through a box-set of the original three movies that I got as a Christmas present (I think I spent New Year's Day going through that set). Overall, it's pretty much what you'd expect: a typical, low budget, quickie sequel that was only made in order to cash in on the success of the original and doesn't even come close to capturing what made its predecessor so special. The best way to sum it up is, while the original was more than just your average 50's monster movie, this one is an average 50's monster movie. That said, though, I wouldn't go as far as to say that Return of the Fly is a bad movie (I don't think any of them are bad, myself), because it still has some merits to it, particularly the return of Vincent Price, and is quite fast-paced and entertaining in a B-movie kind of way, making it a good time-waster, if nothing else.

Helene Delambre, the widow of Andre Delambre, has died after years of being emotionally tormented by the horrible memories of her husband's ill-fated experiments, and whose mysterious death has left many lingering, unanswered questions in the public mind. Following the rain-soaked funeral, Philippe, the now adult son of Andre and Helene, asks his Uncle Francois about the mysterious circumstances surrounding his father's death and his mother's initial accusation of murder. At first refusing to tell him, Francois eventually takes Philippe to the old Delambre Freres foundry, down into his father's abandoned laboratory. There, he tells Philippe about Andre's research, his eventual success with teleporting solid matter, the accident that turned him into a hideous creature with the body of a man and the head and arm of a fly, and how his mother helped him to kill himself. After hearing the story, Philippe, who has read his father's papers and has done some work in the field himself, tells Francois that he wants to rebuild the Disintegrator-Integrator in order to vindicate his father and prove that his theories were right. Francois flatly refuses to help, one reason being quite obvious and another being the cost of such an undertaking, but Philippe is determined to do it any way he can. He, along with his friend and Delambre Freres employee, Alan Hinds, relocate to his grandparents' old home outside of Montreal, which Philippe inherited, in order to resume Andre's work in the mansion's large wine cellar. However, as their work progresses and Philippe's money begins to run out, he forces Francois to back them by threatening to sell his half of Delambre Freres, a move that would destroy the company. Francois reluctantly agrees to give Philippe the money and also decides to work with him, mainly to protect him from the dangers of rebuilding the machine and continuing to try to dissuade him. Little does Philippe know that he has more to worry about than his uncle's fears: Alan, who also goes by the name of Ronald Holmes, is wanted for murder by the British police and intends to steal and sell the plans for the Disintegrator-Integrator to the highest bidder, arranging for funeral home director/illegal dealer Max Barthold to help him with it. Work progresses on the machine and, despite some initial issues with gigantism in the reintegrated live subjects, it begins to shape up nicely... until Alan's past catches up with him and he's forced to dispose of a member of the British police who's been tracking him. His actions in doing so arouse Philippe's suspicions and when Alan realizes he's been caught, he pulls a gun on Philippe and a fight breaks out. In the fight, Alan knocks Philippe out and, rather than killing him, puts him into the disintegrator cabinet with a common housefly, disintegrating them both. After Alan escapes, severely injuring Francois by shooting him in the side, the others attempt to save Philippe by reintegrating him, only for him to be restored with the enormous head and limbs of a fly. The creature breaks out and escapes when the police arrive, while Francois is taken to the hospital. Now, in order to save his nephew, Francois must get in touch with Inspector Beauchamp, who assisted Inspector Charas and knows the truth, and pray that Philippe isn't gunned down by the police, and that he still has his human conscience, before they can find the small fly with his head in order to restore him with the machine.

I remember being quite surprised one night when I was looking up information on this film out of curiosity and discovered that the director was Edward L. Bernds, who I knew as the writer and director of a number of Three Stooges shorts from the mid-40's to the early 50's. I initially thought that it was another director with the same name but nope, it was him, which I found interesting. Bernds started out as a soundman in the 1930's, working at Columbia Pictures as sound engineer on a number of Frank Capra's films, as well as the Three Stooges shorts before he graduated to directing them in 1945. He also directed a number of entries in other short-subject series and also began directing feature films in the late 40's with the Blondie series starring Penny Singleton and Arthur Lake, which led to him doing Gold Raiders, a comedy-western starring the Stooges, and entries in Allied Artists' Bowery Boys film series. After he left Columbia's short subject department upon its downsizing in 1952, which had led to the dismissal of producer Hugh McCollum, Bernds directed a number of films for different studios throughout the 50's and into the early 60's. Besides Return of the Fly, he directed other sci-fi flicks like World Without End, Queen of Outer Space with Zsa Zsa Gabor (which is boring as hell, I might add), and Valley of the Dragons. As far as his talent goes, Bernds was a lot like Kurt Neumann in that he was often hired because he was a dependable journeyman who could get a movie done on time and on budget, rather than because he had any major artistic merits. Indeed, Return of the Fly, which Bernds also wrote, is very competently made but, at the same time, there's nothing that special about it and it looks most other sci-fi flicks made around that time. Despite the steady stream of film work that he was getting around this time, though, Bernds always preferred directing short subjects, which is ultimately why he retired from directing altogether in 1965. Interestingly, his directing career ended where it began: with the Three Stooges. His last jobs as director were The Three Stooges Meet Hercules, The Three Stooges In Orbit, and The New Three Stooges TV show. Bernds died in 2000 at the age of 94.

One of the things that keeps this movie from reaching the level of its predecessor is that the characters aren't nearly as compelling as those in the original, and that includes Vincent Price in his reprisal of the character of Francois Delambre. It's great to see him again and, as I said in my introduction, he's still one of the best aspects of the movie, but at the end of the day, he doesn't have much to do. Francois spends the first half of the film initially attempting to persuade Philippe to give up on trying to rebuild the Disintegrator-Integrator but, when his nephew basically blackmails him into giving him the money he needs to continue with the project, he begins reluctantly working with him, saying that he's doing so in order to protect him from the danger of the machine and to continue trying to dissuade him. Price is still good in his performance here, particularly in the scene at the beginning where he tells Philippe what happened to his father and when he makes it clear to Philippe that he's not happy about him going ahead with the project in spite of what he's said, showing considerable resentment towards Alan Hinds for leaving the company to help him and when Philippe forces him to give him the necessary money in a very unpleasant way, but the odd thing is that, once they get going with their work, Francois never again tries to dissuade Philippe like he said he would. Instead, he just goes along with every request Philippe makes and seems to have grown some faint enthusiasm for it. Maybe he has begun to believe in the project, albeit grudgingly, as Alan chides him about one point, and doesn't want to be a downer. Whatever the case, that intention to dissuade Philippe is the last major part Francois has to play in the story, as once he's shot by Alan, he spends the rest of the movie bedridden, recovering from his wound, refusing to speak to anyone about what's happening except Inspector Beauchamp, who knows the truth. Price still does what he can, coming across as genuine in his imploring to Beauchamp that Philippe must be taken alive and that the little fly with his head must be found, but it's a shame that they brought him back only to give him so little work with, despite his star-billing (he does fire up the machine in the successful attempt to save Philippe but, really, anyone could've done that). It seems like Francois had a bigger role in the first draft of the script, which is what made Price agree to return in the first place, but it got whittled down throughout the subsequent passes.

The real star of the film is Brett Halsey as the now grown-up Philippe Delambre... too bad he's far from the best actor, though. The way I view Halsey here is the way some view David Hedison in the original: a guy who was chosen for the lead because of his matinee looks rather than because of any major acting talent. He plays Philippe as a determined young man who, after having heard nothing but whispers his whole life about what really happened to his father, demands to know the truth and, once he's made aware of it, becomes obsessed with successfully rebuilding the Disintegrator-Integrator in order to vindicate both his father and his research. You learn that, over the years, he's become a fairly brilliant scientist in his own right and has actually done some work in the same field as his father, albeit in secrecy due to his mother, whose death he sees an opportunity to begin in earnest. So determined is Philippe that, even after Francois refuses to finance his project, he presses on, paying for it with his own money and relocating to his house outside of Montreal so he and Alan Hinds can work undisturbed. He even goes as far as to threaten to sell his half of Delambre Freres in order to continue his work if Francois won't help him, which forces his uncle to back him, although Philippe admits he hated being forced to do it that way. As you can see, there are indeed some layers to Philippe's character, but the problem is Halsey is not as charismatic as Hedison or Price. He's not horrible but he's pretty wooden, with his face being quite expressionless, even in scenes where he's supposed to be freaked out at the sight of flies because of what he now knows or excited about the ongoing success and prospects of his work, and his voice is pretty monotone (I don't remember it ever changing in tone that much throughout the entire film). And when he ends up becoming split into two separate, freakish creatures, they don't even try to make them as complex in their behaviors as Andre was. Both the fly-headed human and the human-headed fly appear to have equal amounts of Philippe's consciousness, with the former immediately making a break for it when the police arrive and then tracking down and killing Alan and his business partner, Max, while the latter stays in the laboratory, constantly yelling for help until it's found by Inspector Beauchamp. Granted, Philippe does something that Andre didn't do, which is kill (albeit out of revenge), and the fly with his head may have had only the most basic instinct to save itself in its calling for help since Beauchamp still had to actually catch it, but that's about it. Plus, let's not forget that Philippe throws Alan into a coffin in the funeral room after breaking his neck and closes the lid, something that a mindless fly-monster probably wouldn't do. And what's more, Francois' fears that if and when the fly-headed human returns to the mansion, he may have the dangerous, murderous brain of a fly proves to be unfounded and meaningless as, when he does show up, he goes straight to his childhood friend, Cecile, and is led down into the laboratory without any struggle, eventually being reintegrated as himself.

Honestly, the most interesting and memorable character in the film is David Frankham as the treacherous Alan Hinds. For the first third of the film, he comes across as Philippe's dearly devoted friend, leaving his job at Delambre Freres in order to help him in rebuilding the Disintegrator-Integrator, a move that puts him on Francois' bad side, and when Philippe's money begins running out, he tells him to forget about his salary and to pay him when the device becomes a success. He's also just very charming in general, particularly in a scene where he and Philippe are having tea with the latter's childhood friend, Cecile, and her mother, and when Cecile talks about a fight the two of them had as kids that resulted in Philippe throwing dirt in her face, Alan remarks, "Threw dirt in this beautiful creature's face? You cad." However, you learn that this is all a façade when Alan secretly visits a funeral home in town and meets up with the illegal dealer, Max, who runs the place, revealing himself to actually be Ronald Holmes, a shadowy character who's wanted by the British police for murder. He tells Max his intentions to steal the plans for the Disintegrator-Integrator and arranges for him to find any potential buyers. In this scene, Alan's demeanor changes considerably: while he's still smooth, he's also now coming across as rather sinister and petulant towards Max, referring to him as a greedy pig and whatnot. He also makes it clear that he's not someone to be trusted, as he passively-aggressively tells Max, and before he leaves, reveals that the person he murdered was a former business partner whom he "terminated." After that, Alan works diligently alongside Philippe and Francois, biding his time as he waits for an opportunity to bring pictures of the machine's plans to Max in order to prove to those interested that the device is indeed real. When his chance arrives, however, he's confronted by an officer of the British police who's tracked him down but, in the ensuing struggle, Alan manages to overpower the agent and put him through the disintegrator in order to hide the body. When he reintegrates him, he finds that his atoms got mixed up with that of a guinea pig they'd disintegrated earlier in an experiment, forcing him to dispose of both of them. Alan proves to be quite thorough in doing so, particularly when he puts the officer in his police car and sends it down into the Saint Lawrence River. His strange behavior, however, doesn't go unnoticed, and when Philippe, who was informed of what's going on by Mme. Bonnard, confronts Alan in the laboratory, he drops the act and tries to force Philippe to open the storage cabinet that contains the really important plans for the machine. Another fight breaks out between them and when Alan knocks Philippe out and puts him in the disintegrator, he displays some insane cruelty when he captures a nearby housefly and puts it in the machine with Philippe before disintegrating them both. It's not made clear how much Alan knows about what happened to Andre other than he died under mysterious circumstances but he does know that Philippe is afraid of flies for some reason, using one earlier to freak him out for no apparent reason other than meanness (or possibly to make him leave the lab so he could get down to business). Maybe he felt being disintegrated with something he was afraid of was the best "punishment" for Philippe for trying to interfere. In any case, after he disintegrates Philippe and the fly and leaves with the papers, shooting Francois as he goes, Alan spends the rest of the movie hiding out from the mutated Philippe while trying to finish off his business, but he's eventually tracked down and killed by him at Max's funeral home (he screams like a complete bitch before dying). He doesn't die right away, either, as he rises up out of the coffin that Philippe dumps him in, only to slowly sink back down, all in front of a security guard.

The Fly didn't have much of a supporting cast aside from the four leads but here, the supporting characters are even weaker and less memorable in many ways. A major strike against the film is that it doesn't have a female lead on the level of Helene; the closest we get is the character of Cecile Bonnard (Danielle De Metz), whom you may notice I didn't even mention in the plot synopsis and that's because she could have easily been removed from the story. You'd expect her to be Philippe's love interest, as they make it clear in one scene that there is a connection between the two of them that's lasted since childhood, or be a second target for Alan Hinds given his comment about how pretty she is to Philippe when she's introduced, but, aside from the fact that the fly-headed Philippe goes straight to her room when he returns to the house and grips her hand, she has no significance to the plot whatsoever. In fact, other than the scene where she comforts Philippe after he recoils in fear from the fly he sees while they're having tea and her hugging him at the end after he's been restored to normalcy, she has few significant interactions with him or the main cast and is really just a bystander as well as the film's requisite screamer whenever she sees the fly-man. And there's even less to say about her mother (Janine Grandel), who does little more than speak primarily in French and shows loyalty to the Delambre family by attempting to delay the police for Francois at one point, although she is the one who notices Alan's bizarre behavior and brings it to Philippe's attention.

Originally, Herbert Marshall was supposed to return in the role of Inspector Charas but he became ill before filming began, so Edward Bernds came up with the character of Inspector Beauchamp (John Sutton, who'd acted alongside Vincent Price in another horror sequel, The Invisible Man Returns), who is said to have assisted Charas in the investigation of Andre's death. That right there makes him something of a problematic character already since he was never mentioned in the first film and there's no other officer in that movie who could've possibly been him (maybe he was working for Charas behind the scenes). Plus, the fact that he knows the truth about what happened to Andre makes you ask the question why he was so special that Charas confided in him and no one else, as well as how Charas was able to convince him that this crazy claim was true without evidence. It's painfully obvious that he was meant to be Charas but, at the last minute, they changed his name and put in some dialogue to make it clear that he's a different character (although they don't mention what became of Charas himself at all). It makes you wonder why they didn't save themselves the trouble and just have Sutton replace Marshall as Charas, continuity be damned, something they would do in the next film, Curse of the Fly. Regardless, even if they had managed to bring Marshall back, he, like Price, would have ultimately found himself with very little to do. Since they went through the trouble of having another character there who knows the truth, someone who Francois absolutely demands to see, refusing to talk to anyone else, you'd think it would mean Inspector Beauchamp would have some significance to the plot but that's far from the case. After the opening funeral scene, Beauchamp doesn't return to the film until the third act, having been away on assignment, and even then, he does nothing significant except find and capture the fly with Philippe's head in the laboratory, something anybody could have done (like Cecile). He also doesn't do anything to keep the cops who are chasing after Philippe from shooting him, possibly because he's not the one in charge of this case, as they say, making you wonder why Francois made such a fuss about getting in touch with him to begin with. Really, aside from catching the fly, all he does is tell Francois that he found it and later inform him that Philippe has killed Alan Hinds and Max Barthold.

Beauchamp is made especially pointless since Sgt. Dubois (Richard Flato), the man in charge of the investigation, actually saw the human-headed fly in the laboratory. Moreover, when he tries to question Francois at the hospital and the only response he gets is a demand to speak to Inspector Beauchamp, Dubois, upon learning that it's because Beauchamp is the only one who knows the truth, asks if it has something to do with a fly. When he hears this, Francois demands to know what Dubois saw but the sergeant simply says that it was nothing, tells him that he'll try to contact Beauchamp, and leaves the room, never to be seen again. If they were going to do that, then why have Beauchamp or even Inspector Charas? They could have simply removed Beauchamp from the story completely, have Francois refuse to speak to anybody other than Charas at the hospital, and then have Dubois reveal that he saw the human-headed fly and that he understands part of what's going on, leading Francois to tell him the whole story and Dubois, as a result, telling his men not to shoot Philippe as well as going down into the laboratory to catch the fly himself. That would have been so much more beneficial to the plot than going through the trouble of bringing in a character who knows the truth but doesn't do much of anything.

Other than the brief return of Gaston (Michael Mark), the night watchman who found Andre's body in the first film and has been haunted by it ever since, believing that the old Delambre Freres foundry is cursed, the only other character worth mentioning is Max Barthold (Dan Seymour), the gluttonous funeral home director who also happens to be a notorious illegal seller who Alan Hinds arranges to find buyers for the Disintegrator-Integrator plans. He doesn't trust Alan, whom he calls "Ronny," as far as he could throw him, a fact that Alan himself says makes him a very smart man, and is initially dismissive of his plan, but, when he learns what it is, he decides to go along with it, providing Alan can come up with evidence that'll convince would-be buyers that it's real. Max is initially glad that he went along with the scheme as he gets a number of offers for the machine but soon changes his tune when things go south and the mutated Philippe is searching for Alan. He's reassured that he has nothing to worry about since Philippe doesn't know him, which should indeed be the case, but he's actually killed before Alan when Philippe breaks into his funeral home. It is odd that Philippe would target Max since, again, he had no way of knowing that he was involved with Alan, unless you count that scene where he found Alan standing outside the funeral home when he was supposed to be running errands in town. Even though he did kill the right person, deciding that this man who he's never seen before is it was still a really big assumption on his part, especially for somebody who's supposedly saddled with a portion of a fly's brain. What's more, Max's death is downright pathetic: Philippe corners him in the morgue and he does nothing but stand there, watching the fly-monster approach rather than trying to get away. It's a cliché of the times but it's annoying, nonetheless.

The original film may have been a very polished movie, with a classy, sophisticated feel that put it several notches above most monster movies of the time, but the sequel is another story. It looks and feels every bit like a typical low budget, 50's sci-fi/monster flick, right down to the black-and-white photography. Its budget was somewhere around $225,000, much lower than that of the original, and as a result, they couldn't afford to shoot it in color, even though it was still done in CinemaScope. While it's really good, stark black-and-white, it's still a big comedown from the original's beautiful Technicolor, and keeps it from standing out amongst similar films of the time. What's more, even though they tailored the script so they could reuse the sets from the first film (shot from different angles to give the illusion that they're different places), they don't look as elegant here as they did before. I don't know if it's the monochrome look or what but the sets, particularly the laboratory and the sitting room, look cheaper than they did before (maybe because they now had a "used" feel to them or something of the sort), as do the few new ones that were used. But that's far from the only thing that makes this film inferior to its parent.

The special effects work, particularly conception of the fly-creatures, is done in such campy and awkward manner that, when people talk about how ridiculous they found the original film to be, I'm convinced it's because they've actually seen this movie without realizing it (indeed, I often see images from this film when they're talking about the original, including in that Monster Mania book I mentioned in my review of the original). Let's start with the biggest elephant in the room: the fly-headed man that Philippe becomes. For some reason, it was decided that, instead of being the same size as a normal human head, the fly head had to be enormous (I'd say around the size of a really big beach ball) and that, in addition to a fly claw as an arm, he also has one for his right foot, which he drags along, creating a scraping sound that signals his presence from off-camera. While the head is reasonably well-designed, with a nice, undulating proboscis that you can see at the end, it comes across as very cumbersome for the actor (Ed Wolff) to wear. David Hedison, despite the handicap of the mask, was able to bring some finesse to his performance in the first film but here, the enormous mask looks very top-heavy and causes the actor to stumble around whenever he's running or look clumsy and uncoordinated when he's sneaking through the brush. In fact, there's a moment right after he escapes out of the lab and is being chased through the woods by the police that, if you look closely, you can see him stop and adjust the fly-head so he can see better. And while I think the idea at the end as to why he's moving so sluggishly is that he's supposed to be weak and dying, it still just looks like a guy who can't see being led around a set. The head's size doesn't make sense in context either because, while they had a problem with the machine causing gigantism early on, they fixed it before Philippe and the fly got disintegrated together. So, once again, they had an opportunity to make things less awkward for the story and they blew it (although, that still wouldn't have explained why the fly gets a tiny human head). In addition, unlike the creature that Andre became, Philippe kills a couple of people, but those scenes also come across as ridiculous when you see this man wearing a gigantic fly-head wrapping his arm around his victims' necks and slowly strangling them to death, especially when it doesn't feel like he'd be able to muster up the strength to do so. The claw that he has also makes things look more cumbersome than they should, especially when it looks like he's using it to hold onto things for balance or to move things out of his way. Interestingly, a makeup effect that's more effective, or at least more startling, is the British officer who Alan Hinds puts through the disintegrator after killing him and when he's reintegrated, he has the feet of a guinea pig that had been disintegrated earlier. It doesn't really look like what it's supposed to be (I think it's shot well, though) but, when I first saw it, I was quite taken aback by it and I still think it's a wallop of a shock.

The matting and optical effects are a little more hit-and-miss. The effects used to put Brett Halsey's head on the body of the fly are interesting to look at and are startling effective... in quick, brief shots, as is the case in the film. When you're able to look at them in close scrutiny, though, they don't hold up as well (as you can see, the image here is really funky-looking). Plus, while the human-headed fly in the original was disturbing and poignant in its screaming, this is impossible to take seriously. Halsey's voice sounds ridiculous when it's high-pitched and his constant screaming of, "Cecile! Cecile! I'm Philippe! Philippe! No one will help me!", combined with images like the one above don't help either. And why doesn't he have human limbs if the fly-headed man got saddled with a couple of fly claws? There's a similar matting effect that's used for the guinea pig that's reintegrated with the hands and feet of the British detective and, again, it's surprisingly effective because you only see it for a couple of seconds. That's a big compliment that I can give the filmmakers: they seemed to know they had a low budget and were smart in showing you just enough without lingering on the effect so that you could see how cheap it looked. However, when Alan Hinds attempts to squish the guinea pig with his foot (a moment I hate because of the squealing that poor thing makes), there's a shot where you can see the human hands underneath his shoe... but they're normal-sized, making for an awkward image, to say the least. And as for the teleportation effects, they're as cheap as you can get. In the original film, you really didn't see the subjects getting teleported; you just saw the disintegrator chamber light up with a blinding flash and then dissipate to reveal that the subject was now gone. Here, they use jump cuts to go from a disintegrator chamber with a subject in it to an empty one and it looks so archaic. They should have stuck to the technique they used before.

If you've seen the original film a good number of times, as I have, there are a couple of noticeable continuity errors that the sequel has with it, in addition to the sudden appearance of the character of Inspector Beauchamp. For one, at the beginning of the movie when Francois and Philippe visit Andre's old laboratory, you can see the messages that he wrote for Helene on the chalkboard in the first film. You'd think that would be an example of good continuity but, remember, Helene told Inspector Charas that she rubbed it out, as well as that Andre burned his notes. Philippe, however, says that he's studied some of his father's notes without his mother's knowing and during the experiments, he often refers back to them. How can that be possible? And what's more, how could he have drawn up a bunch of plans and papers for Alan Hinds to steal if Andre burned everything? As it is with the dicey science in these movies, the real answer to this question is that there'd be no story to tell, so you have to just let some things go.

Paul Sawtell returned to do the score, this time bringing along fellow composer Bert Shefter, whom he often worked with, but their music here doesn't come close to matching the creepiness or memorability of the original. Since this film isn't disturbing like the original, Sawtell must have felt that it needed a different musical sound, or maybe he was a composer who didn't like repeating himself, but either way, like everything else, this score is more in line with what you often got in science fiction and monster movies around that time. Unfortunately, that means it's not as memorable as the original's music. The main title, which is by far the most distinctive part of the score, begins a high-pitched, flute sort of sound, obviously meant to emulate the sporadic, unpredictable flying of a housefly, and then leads into a horn piece that's a bit like the main theme to the original, only nowhere near as loud, bombastic, or threatening. Honestly, except for a sort of slow, apprehensive piece that plays in a couple of sections, like when Max is pacing nervously around his funeral home after Alan's plan goes south, I don't have much else to say about the music because it's very forgettable. It's a real shame, too, considering what we got before, and by the same composer.

Return of the Fly is just not a classic like the original and is also quite a massive step down from it. The characters and performances aren't as compelling, the story has some continuity issues with the first film, the slashed budget that the studio imposed on the filmmakers is apparent from the get-go, the special effects are a mixed bag, ranging from passable to very bad, the portrayal and execution of the creatures aren't as well done and often feel unintentionally funny, the music score is forgettable for the most part, and the film, overall, feels exactly like what it is: a quickly-made, cheap cash-in on a popular movie. But, all my gripes aside, I wouldn't say it's an out-and-out horrible movie. It's only 80 minutes long and goes by quickly, Vincent Price, despite not having much to do, is still enjoyable to watch as always and does the best job he can with the meager material, and the film is fairly entertaining in a B-movie way. I would ultimately describe it as one of those movies that, if you can turn your brain off and not take it too seriously, is an enjoyable way to kill some time, if nothing else.